Robert Latimer
July 20/2003

To the Supreme Court of Canada
Your July 7/2003 reply to my June 2/2003 letter stating "there is nothing further the Court can do for you", is consistent with the workings of the Judicial process on my situation to date. I can not accept that this Court the highest level of the Canadian Judicial Process is so eager to tolerate, and endorse such fraudulent tactics of my opponents, while telling me this. I can not accept this Court's position that it can not correct itself, and do not understand why it would even want to continue to endorse something that will most likely eventually be investigated, and proven fraudulent.
This Courts finding's are not supported by the record before it. I would hope that such a realization would not spur this Court into doing something for me. But ignite the power invested in this Court by all Canadians into doing something for itself, it's reputation, and it's image in the eyes of the vast majority of Canadians that want to have confidence in it's ruling people.
I understand that this Court does not have to give reasons for its decisions. But when this Court does render a decision with accompanying findings I believe it should be responsible for the veracity of these findings. Not only responsible to me, but to the rest of the people of this country, for they want to have confidence in this Court's authority, and want to have confidence in this Court's findings.
Of course the thrust of my argument is, your decision is based on fraudulent arguments. The musing "There is a kind of pride in scientific illiteracy" of Justice Ian Binnie indicates to me a lack of confidence in this Court's finding. I believe, this Court has as much to gain from setting the record straight as any one individual or group other than us.